» HOME
BC  
What is "Restorative Justice"?
Mission Statement and History
Maps and Directions
Contact Information
People
» Board of Trustees
   Staff | Associates
» Colloquia and Committee    Chairs
BTI Annual Lectureship
Cross Registration
BTI Library and Resource Network
Global Connections
Field Education
International Peacebuilding
» IRENE - International
   Reconciliation Network

» Peacemaking Database
Calendar of Events
Community Awards
Catalogue of Courses
Weekly Newsletter
Science & Religion Newsletter
Bulletin of the BTI
Guide for International Students
21st Century Ministry Booklets
» Theological Literacy
» Ministry in the 21st Century
» The Church and    Globalization
» World View, Scientific    Practice and Pastoral    Ministry
» Building Cultures of    Reconciliation
» Models of Ministry
Etoile Film Series on Religion and Conflict
International Mission and Ecumenism
Transforming and Restorative Justice
Science and Religion
Inter-religious Dialogue
Liturgy, Worship and The Arts
Religion and Ecology
Spiritual Formation
»
Sermon Contest
Youth and Young Adult Ministry Studies
 
Faculty Colloquia
Certificates
» International Mission and    Ecumenism
» Science and Religion
» Youth and Young Adult    Ministry Studies
The Global Church
The Ecumenical Imperative

We would like to think that forgiveness moves toward reconciliation and that reconciliation moves toward patterns of life that are based in trust and are just and equitable. This would appear to be the conclusion of Psalm 85:10 – the meaningful meeting place of truth, mercy, justice, and peace (Lederach). Such relationships might be called restorative, or we might use the term “restorative justice.” To be reconciled to another, not merely to tolerate the other, means that change is required on the part of both parties as we seek the restoration of each other, something we or the other may or may not be prepared to do (Volf). Another way to refer to such new patterns of relationship is to use the term “repairative” justice or even “transformative” justice. This perspective about how we might live together draws upon the Hebrew Bible, or both OT and NT assumptions – and also upon the best wisdom traditions of indigenous peoples and other religions or faith traditions. It emphasizes the humanity of both victims and victimizers. It seeks to repair social connections, to foster peace rather than retribution against offenders (Minow, 92).

1) Various Definitions: Most agree that restorative justice promotes healing, but the kind of healing depends upon the nature of the breach. One focus is to see crime as more than simply law-breaking, an offense against governmental laws and regulations. Instead, RJ advocates also see crime as causing multiple injuries to victims, the community and the offender (Zehr, 181-186). Another lens is to view the criminal justice process as one that should help repair the injuries brought about by crime (Wright, 114-117). Still others protest the government’s monopoly over society’s response to crime. Victims, offenders, and their communities must also be involved as early as possible and as much as possible (Van Ness, 31).

2) Consider the Following Example: Carolyn Boys-Watson, director of the Center for Restorative Justice, Suffolk University, defines our term in the following way: “Restorative justice is a broad term which encompasses a growing social movement to institutionalize peaceful resolutions to criminal and human rights violations. These range from international peacemaking tribunals such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa to innovations within our courts, jails, and prisons, such as victim-offender dialogue, community justice committees and victim impact panels. Rather than privileging the law and the state, restorative justice engages the victim, offender and the affected community in search of solutions that promote repair and reconciliation. Restorative justice seeks to build partnerships to re-establish mutual responsibility for constructive responses to crime and wrongdoing within our communities.”

3) Examples of Recent Literature Include:
• Shay Bilchik, Guide for Implementing the Balanced and Restorative Justice Model. Report (US Dept. of Justice Office of Justice Programs, 1998).
• Michael L. Hadley, ed., The Spiritual Roots of Restorative Justice (Albany: SUNY, 2001).
• Martha Minow, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness (Beacon Press, 1999).
• Daniel Van Ness and Karen Strong, Restoring Justice (Anderson, 1997).
• Barry Stuart, Building Community Justice Partnerships: Community Peacemaking Circles (Yukon: Community Peacemaking Circles, n.d./1996?).
• Howard Zehr, Changing Lenses. A New Focus for Crime and Justice (Herald Press, 1995).
• Miroslav Volf, Exclusion and Embrace. A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation (Abingdon, 1996).
• Martin Wright, Justice for Victims and Offenders (Open University Press, 1991).


 
   
© 2004 The Boston Theological Institute